Archive for June, 2008

Abstract Revisited (+ exegesis ditty)

Posted in Labsome blog on June 28, 2008 by cubeshine

Hobnobbing with the most bitter of postmodern cynics, musical aesthetics have plateaued and dulled; bodies gigue mechanically only to the orchestras of CBDs, and so where might we look today for musical inspiration? Better and beyond here and now, let us heed Luigi Russolo and turn inwards to the human capacity for culturally attuned listening, where the potential musicality of noise resides. Digital technology enables accurate repetitions of single sounds to instigate what Pierre Schaeffer calls ‘reduced listening’ on an audience, which in turn offers an opportunity to realise the aesthetics of perception above simply the perception of aesthetics. Flanear is a public art soundscape project that aims to rightfully return appreciation and enjoyment of Melbourne’s CBD environment to the auditory beholder.

Observing the linear evolution of Western music, a notion unattainable in human sciences, Flanear attempts to prophesise the direction in which music will develop. Jacques Attali acknowledges the socially reflective nature of music throughout history, from 10th century liturgical to classical to modern popular. Music as an immaterial product of a dynamic society necessarily embeds itself within the theoretical contexts of its time. Unlike the sciences with their malleable axioms and contradictory paradigm shifts, the forerunners of any type of music are the people who create, perform and consume it, rather than the music that precedes it. With this in mind, Flanear is certainly not merely a soundscape; it is a revelation of the musicality of noise and the celebration of ‘prosumers’ transcending their supposedly initial Internet context and fixing their place within all perception of art. Where, indeed, will music go from here? Folk, secular, sacred, Baroque, minimalist, electronic, ska, death metal; postmodernists may be satisfied with settling on the pastiche, quotation and appropriation answer. What I am suggesting through my project is that the development of musical aesthetics does not lie within the structural elements of tonality, rhythm or timbre, but rather in a reversion back to almost ‘primitive’ listening practices. As bodies with increasingly translatable boundaries, returning to our inherent bodily capacities – inclusive within and observant of, but always autonomous in the robotics of contemporary life – the act of listening itself will find newfound importance as we embrace the aesthetics of perception above the perception of aesthetics.

Final thoughts….

Posted in Transient Spaces on June 13, 2008 by cubeshine

One of the biggest achievements I feel from having completed my first Dreamweaver website is in how the narrative works. This was the first time I closely considered narrative in a virtual, non-linear setting. Sure, I’ve had to set up plenty of blogs through a media degree, but I don’t think I ever had to think about how everything was connecting to everything else. Blogs tend to be a bit wonderful in the way they’re already formated and set up for you, so you just need to plop in content and Bob’s your uncle.

For the Modern Primitives website, I spent a long time deciding how it was all to be organised. Building a website right from scratch, I have found, is quite demanding and complicated. I didn’t want to have all the pages right up front, instantly clickable. I chose to be a bit more demure in how I presented my content, letting people discover more should they choose to. That’s an Internet characteristic, is it not?

I’ve had a gander at my site map, and to a certain extent I’m a bit disappointed that it’s not at all indicative of my linking efforts. I. spent. ages. figuring out how all the pages would somehow link to each other. One section leads to another which leads to another which might get you back where you came from or stick you in another website. Who knows. But it’s not knowing that’s the point, it’s having those paths there.

I remember reading an article by the brilliantly obscure Brian Massumi, in which he details a theory on what the virtual is. In a nutshell, the virtual is everything that isn’t. It’s the name your parents might have called you, it’s a door that you didn’t forget to lock, it’s every single direction you are physically able to move in after you’ve read this. Virtually anything can happen in the next 5 minutes, but general patterns and happenstances and what not usually means the next 5 minutes is somewhat predictable.

And so we come to the virtual world of the Internet. It’s not about points or hubs or sites, it’s about relationships. It’s about how you get from one place to another and having that option or chance. On that note, Internet users ultimately create their own narrative. My biggest job was to be sure the journey always runs smoothly.

HOORAY!

Posted in Labsome blog, Transient Spaces, websites on June 13, 2008 by cubeshine

View complete Modern Primitives website:

HAZZAH!

Remediation

Posted in Transient Spaces on June 10, 2008 by cubeshine

Ah, that classic gem of postmodern technological society.

remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation remediation

I always think of remediation in terms of postmodern art. Martin Arnold is an Austrian film artist who is known for his remediation and reappropriation of 1950’s American popular television content. He takes clips several seconds in duration and edits them in such a way that they then may last up to 10 minutes. Repeats, slowing down some parts, quickening them in others, more and more repeats. In what he does, he destroys the original narrative. A few seconds of footage taken entirely out of context and extensively manipulated. What is interesting in some of his works is how he creates his own narrative. We can wonder about issues of authorship in the face of remediation. It’s not exactly his footage, other people entirely produced that piece of film. Martin Arnold seems to prove that you can have authorship and own narrative despite remediation.